The Dark Corners of the Lindbergh Kidnapping
Volume II
by
Book Cover & Preview Text
Milton Gaglio & Max Rosenhain When asked, Gaglio told police the reason he was there at that time was because Condon told him that he “expected a note or a call on that night” so he remained with him that evening with his car, thinking he may have to drive him someplace. This is an interesting claim. How would Condon know that a communication was coming that very night if what he told police about this call was true? And if he did know then why wasn’t that information ever shared with police? Why did he tell them something much different? For those “supporters” of Condon this would be shrugged off as either a fabrication made by Gaglio or a “mistake” on his part. However, neither of these explanations are adequate. We know this because Condon told Max Rosenhain the same thing: “I guess March 9th was on a Tuesday if I am not mistaken. Condon received a telephone call on Thursday after we came back on the same week and the telephone message was very short, I wasn’t present when it came, but Condon told me about it and said that between 8 and 9 the following night of Friday March 12th he would receive a communication or whatever it was, that he would receive a communication.” So it’s obvious Condon had specific information he was sharing with these men that he was hiding from the cops. It became clear that the question Gaglio posed to Perrone came from information shared with him by Condon before Perrone arrived. Gaglio’s denial he ever said it only proves that he should not have known – but he did.
Formats
Book Details
About the Book
This book will follow the same path as volume one by continuing to explore the dark corners of the Lindbergh kidnapping. All the topics throughout this volume will be ones that were never properly examined or evaluated anytime in the past. And the facts revealed cause the historical account to become very unlikely—if not impossible—as a result. As with the first, it is an unorthodox style—a book that may not transition from one chapter to the next as is typical. There may be places where I repeat certain information and/or mention different versions which may not always match up. I do this intentionally so the reader will have all of the information necessary to draw a personal conclusion. I have been very fortunate to be able to access a number of sources that are either not well-known or privately held. Each of these has enhanced my knowledge of the case, and I have tried very hard to communicate the essential findings of each of these to you in this book. In this regard, my book is unique and should offer new information to anyone who reads it, including the most seasoned researchers.
About the Author
Michael Melsky studied both Criminal Justice and Religion at Moravian College where he received a Bachelor of Arts. He later graduated from the Federal Law Enforcement Academy and was employed for over twenty-six years with the Federal Bureau of Prisons before retiring in October 2017. He has been researching this case since January 2000 and has utilized numerous archives, although his main archival source is the New Jersey State Police Headquarters. He has been acknowledged in many case-related materials and was also a member of the team that produced the posthumous pardon application to President Bush for Ellis H. Parker in 2008. His first book, Volume I of The Dark Corners, was published August 2016 by Infinity Publishing.